This gun was the answer to a question no one ever asked: did they make a semi-automatic revolver? Yes, they did, and the War Geek wants one.
Wednesday, May 28, 2008
The sword from Glory Road
Tuesday, May 27, 2008
The meteorite pistols
These intricately decorated guns were said to have been forged from the iron of a fallen meteorite. They were a gift from the commander of a South American region, which would later become Argentina, to the fourth president, James Madison. "Permit me therefore to present to your Excellency... a specimen of the first essays of the manufacture of arms established in the provinces of Buenos Ayres and Tucuman," wrote General Ignacio Alvarez in an accompanying 14-page letter. Over time, they passed into the hands of Madison's successor - James Monroe - and are now on display at a museum dedicated to him.
Scientists have recently subjected the pistols to a battery of tests to determine whether the story of their origin is correct - and found that they're not made of meteoritic metal after all. Moreover, the intricately decorated handles aren't made of silver, but of an alloy unique to that part of South America at the time. Also, the pistols proved to be fully functioning weapons, not the decorative imitations they'd been presumed to be for so long.
Scientists have recently subjected the pistols to a battery of tests to determine whether the story of their origin is correct - and found that they're not made of meteoritic metal after all. Moreover, the intricately decorated handles aren't made of silver, but of an alloy unique to that part of South America at the time. Also, the pistols proved to be fully functioning weapons, not the decorative imitations they'd been presumed to be for so long.
Monday, May 26, 2008
Sunday, May 25, 2008
The S-tank
The S-tank, known in Swedish as the Stridsvagn 103. Low, fast, very cool looking, and deadly at its game. Stridsvagn 103C has recently been phased out and replaced by Stridsvagn 121 and 122 (Leopard 2).
Saturday, May 24, 2008
Soviet, oops, German tank
From February to September 1944, heavy battles were fought in the narrow, 50 km-wide, Narva front in the north-eastern part of Estonia. Over 100,000 men were killed and 300,000 men were wounded there. During battles in the summer of 1944, this tank was captured from the Soviet army and used by the German army. (This is the reason that there are German markings painted on the tank's exterior.) On 19th September 1944, German troops began an organized retreat along the Narva front. It is suspected that the tank was then purposefully driven into the lake, abandoning it when its captors left the area.
At that time, a local boy walking by the lake, Kurtna Matasjarv, saw tank tracks leading into the lake, but not coming out anywhere. For two months he saw air bubbles emerging from the lake. This gave him reason to believe that there must be an armored vehicle at the lake's bottom. A few years ago, he told the story to the leader of the local war-history club. Together with other club members, Mr. Igor Shedunov initiated diving expeditions to the bottom of the lake about a year ago. At the depth of seven metres they discovered the tank resting under a three metre layer of peat.
Enthusiasts from the club, under Mr Shedunov's leadership, decided to pull the tank out. In September of 2000 they turned to Mr Aleksander Borovkovthe, manager of the Narva open pit of the stock company AS Eesti Polevkivi, to rent the company's Komatsu D375A-2 bulldozer.
The pulling operation began at 0900 and was concluded at 1500, with several technical breaks. The weight of the tank, combined with the travel incline, made a pulling operation that required significant muscle. The D375A-2 handled the operation with power and style. The weight of the fully armed tank was around 30 tons, so the active force required to retrieve it was similar. A main requirement for the 68-ton dozer was to have enough weight to prevent shoe-slip while moving up the hill.
After the tank surfaced, it turned out to be a trophy tank that had been captured by the German army in the course of the battle at Sinimaed (Blue Hills) about six weeks before it was sunk in the lake. Altogether, 116 shells were found on board. Remarkably, the tank was in good condition, with no rust, and all systems (except the engine) in working condition. This is a very rare machine, especially considering that it fought both on the Russian and the German sides, and pans are under way to fully restore the tank. It will be displayed at a war history museum that will be founded at the Gorodenko village on the left bank of the River Narv.
At that time, a local boy walking by the lake, Kurtna Matasjarv, saw tank tracks leading into the lake, but not coming out anywhere. For two months he saw air bubbles emerging from the lake. This gave him reason to believe that there must be an armored vehicle at the lake's bottom. A few years ago, he told the story to the leader of the local war-history club. Together with other club members, Mr. Igor Shedunov initiated diving expeditions to the bottom of the lake about a year ago. At the depth of seven metres they discovered the tank resting under a three metre layer of peat.
Enthusiasts from the club, under Mr Shedunov's leadership, decided to pull the tank out. In September of 2000 they turned to Mr Aleksander Borovkovthe, manager of the Narva open pit of the stock company AS Eesti Polevkivi, to rent the company's Komatsu D375A-2 bulldozer.
The pulling operation began at 0900 and was concluded at 1500, with several technical breaks. The weight of the tank, combined with the travel incline, made a pulling operation that required significant muscle. The D375A-2 handled the operation with power and style. The weight of the fully armed tank was around 30 tons, so the active force required to retrieve it was similar. A main requirement for the 68-ton dozer was to have enough weight to prevent shoe-slip while moving up the hill.
After the tank surfaced, it turned out to be a trophy tank that had been captured by the German army in the course of the battle at Sinimaed (Blue Hills) about six weeks before it was sunk in the lake. Altogether, 116 shells were found on board. Remarkably, the tank was in good condition, with no rust, and all systems (except the engine) in working condition. This is a very rare machine, especially considering that it fought both on the Russian and the German sides, and pans are under way to fully restore the tank. It will be displayed at a war history museum that will be founded at the Gorodenko village on the left bank of the River Narv.
Thursday, May 22, 2008
The A-10
Lumpy and ugly as a Warthog (and aptly codenamed such until they wimped out and changed it to Thunderbolt, which at least was an equally stumpy aircraft), the A-10 provides close air support of ground forces by attacking tanks, armored vehicles, and other ground targets; it also provides a limited air interdiction role. It is the first U.S. Air Force aircraft designed exclusively for close air support.
Tuesday, May 20, 2008
The V-22 Osprey
The V-22 Osprey is neither a helicopter nor an airplane, but a hybrid that does both. It's also the baddest looking aircraft since the A-10, and will, if used properly, transform assaults and invasions. (It's also made just down the road from the War Geek.)
Monday, May 19, 2008
The Sheridan tank
Featured in one of my novels, At All Hazards, this has always been one of my favorite armored vehicles. Not tough enough for Central European armored warfare, it got replaced early except in low-threat wars like Vietnam and Iraq.
The Spencer rifle
Not a good idea
From the International Herald Tribune: "Military commanders have apologised to community leaders in Iraq after a U.S. soldier used a copy of the Koran for shooting practice, fearing an outburst of anger among U.S.-allied tribesmen. The U.S. military said on Sunday the soldier, who was not identified, had been disciplined and ordered to leave Iraq after a copy of the Muslim holy book was found riddled with bullet holes at a shooting range near Baghdad on May 11. Pictures obtained by al-Reuters showed the holy book with at least 10 bullet holes. An Iraqi community leader told Reuters the apology by senior American military commanders had helped calm tensions. Major-General Jeffery Hammond, the commander of U.S. troops in Baghdad, and other officers were met by hundreds of protesters when they went to Radwaniya to deliver the apology on Saturday. "I am a man of honor, I am a man of character. You have my word this will never happen again," Hammond told the crowd.
Rico says 'discipline' should have included being handed over to the Iraqis for a little corporal punishment...
Rico says 'discipline' should have included being handed over to the Iraqis for a little corporal punishment...
No more cluster bombs, alas
According to the International Herald Tribune: Ireland convened diplomats from more than 100 nations Monday in hopes of negotiating a treaty banning cluster bombs, which have littered battlefields worldwide with potentially deadly "duds."
Each bomb, rocket or shell scatters "bomblets" that carpet enemy troops or armored vehicles. But some fail to detonate, creating unmapped minefields that kill or maim civilians — including children who can mistake the objects for toys — months or years later.
The negotiations, begun in Norway last year, seek to impose maximum restrictions on cluster bomb manufacturing, sales and storage. But myriad arguments loom over defining what a cluster bomb is, and whether to exempt the most technologically reliable or precise systems.
If participants achieve a draft treaty in Dublin during the coming 12 days of negotiations, a formal signing ceremony would follow in Norway in December.
These talks are being pursued outside the auspices of the United Nations. The three biggest producers of cluster bombs — the U.S., Russia and China — oppose ban proposals, wield vetoes on the U.N. Security Council, and are not represented in Dublin.
But U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon praised the diplomats' breakaway effort in a videotaped message inside Ireland's largest sports stadium, Croke Park, the negotiating venue.
Irish and Norwegian ministers said a treaty would put pressure on leading cluster bomb manufacturers. They said this is what happened when most countries — but not the big three powers — backed a land mine ban in 1997.
"Our experience with the land mine treaty was that, even though certain countries refused to sign it, they behaved as though they had signed it," Norwegian Deputy Defense Minister Espen Barth Eide said.
Eide said a treaty banning cluster bombs would isolate leading producers and spur them to develop weapons "that detonate where they should and when they should."
The U.S. emphasizes that its defense industry is attempting to do exactly that, developing "bomblets" that each contain internal targeting systems.
The State Department said last month it would not attend the Dublin conference, preferring sporadic U.N.-organized talks in Geneva that seek nonbinding rules for using cluster bombs and cleaning up their consequences.
Other major makers of cluster bombs — Russia, China, Israel, India and Pakistan — also avoided the talks.
Irish Foreign Minister Micheal Martin said he was confident that any treaty agreement would "create its own momentum" and discourage non-signatory nations from promoting the weapons.
Diplomats from several cluster bomb-making nations in Europe, East Asia and South America came to the Dublin talks seeking exemptions for at least some of their own weapons systems.
Britain seeks permission to keep using two of its systems: an artillery-fired shell containing 49 bomblets, and a helicopter-fired rocket containing nine each.
Those seeking exemptions argue that the most modern "bomblets," if they fail to detonate, also contain self-destruct systems designed to eliminate the long-term risk to civilians.
Most countries want a full ban. Pope Benedict XVI backed that call Sunday.
So did nine British generals in a letter published Monday in The Times newspaper of London. The signatories included former field commanders in Yugoslavia and Iraq.
"Cluster munitions were developed to combat a level of Cold War confrontation that never happened," the generals wrote. "However, in modern wars, conducted among the people, they have consistently caused civilian casualties both during and after attacks."
Each bomb, rocket or shell scatters "bomblets" that carpet enemy troops or armored vehicles. But some fail to detonate, creating unmapped minefields that kill or maim civilians — including children who can mistake the objects for toys — months or years later.
The negotiations, begun in Norway last year, seek to impose maximum restrictions on cluster bomb manufacturing, sales and storage. But myriad arguments loom over defining what a cluster bomb is, and whether to exempt the most technologically reliable or precise systems.
If participants achieve a draft treaty in Dublin during the coming 12 days of negotiations, a formal signing ceremony would follow in Norway in December.
These talks are being pursued outside the auspices of the United Nations. The three biggest producers of cluster bombs — the U.S., Russia and China — oppose ban proposals, wield vetoes on the U.N. Security Council, and are not represented in Dublin.
But U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon praised the diplomats' breakaway effort in a videotaped message inside Ireland's largest sports stadium, Croke Park, the negotiating venue.
Irish and Norwegian ministers said a treaty would put pressure on leading cluster bomb manufacturers. They said this is what happened when most countries — but not the big three powers — backed a land mine ban in 1997.
"Our experience with the land mine treaty was that, even though certain countries refused to sign it, they behaved as though they had signed it," Norwegian Deputy Defense Minister Espen Barth Eide said.
Eide said a treaty banning cluster bombs would isolate leading producers and spur them to develop weapons "that detonate where they should and when they should."
The U.S. emphasizes that its defense industry is attempting to do exactly that, developing "bomblets" that each contain internal targeting systems.
The State Department said last month it would not attend the Dublin conference, preferring sporadic U.N.-organized talks in Geneva that seek nonbinding rules for using cluster bombs and cleaning up their consequences.
Other major makers of cluster bombs — Russia, China, Israel, India and Pakistan — also avoided the talks.
Irish Foreign Minister Micheal Martin said he was confident that any treaty agreement would "create its own momentum" and discourage non-signatory nations from promoting the weapons.
Diplomats from several cluster bomb-making nations in Europe, East Asia and South America came to the Dublin talks seeking exemptions for at least some of their own weapons systems.
Britain seeks permission to keep using two of its systems: an artillery-fired shell containing 49 bomblets, and a helicopter-fired rocket containing nine each.
Those seeking exemptions argue that the most modern "bomblets," if they fail to detonate, also contain self-destruct systems designed to eliminate the long-term risk to civilians.
Most countries want a full ban. Pope Benedict XVI backed that call Sunday.
So did nine British generals in a letter published Monday in The Times newspaper of London. The signatories included former field commanders in Yugoslavia and Iraq.
"Cluster munitions were developed to combat a level of Cold War confrontation that never happened," the generals wrote. "However, in modern wars, conducted among the people, they have consistently caused civilian casualties both during and after attacks."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)